- Differences between exfat and mac os extended software#
- Differences between exfat and mac os extended code#
- Differences between exfat and mac os extended Pc#
- Differences between exfat and mac os extended windows#
This started back in the days of iPods that had very low-resolution screens and very limited storage (by today's standards) – for which using storage for full-size JPGs would have been an extravagant waste.Ģ.
Differences between exfat and mac os extended Pc#
But it reduces the resolution of copies of photos it sends from a Mac or PC to a synced mobile device. iTunes preserves the resolution of photos uploaded through a (Camera Connection Kit => mobile device => Mac or PC) path. They are not going to automatically apply any form of lossy compression or downsizing to your photos.Īpple does make some space-saving optimizations when you work with photos on both desktop/laptop (Mac, PC) and mobile (iPhone, iPad, iPod Touch, iPod) devices.ġ.
Differences between exfat and mac os extended windows#
Their current support for APFS on Windows is read-only.) With HFS+, the third party vendors have had a very long time to figure out the format – and I believe that the Darwin OS (Mac OS X minus all of the Apple added value) included HFS+ reference code.
(The makers of MacDrive appear to be concerned about this, too.
Differences between exfat and mac os extended code#
APFS is new enough and complex enough that I would wonder if third-party vendors really understood it well enough to write their own code to reliably handle APFS drives in all cases. If you are looking to mount a Macintosh-formatted drive on a Windows PC, using a third-party utility such as MacDrive or one of the Paragon utilities, I would think HFS+ would be a better choice than APFS. You should, of course, keep backups of all of your photos – regardless of what filesystem you choose for the main drive(s).
Differences between exfat and mac os extended software#
That type of bug would be a very big deal for Apple, and would move to the top of the list of the things for their software engineers to fix, and probably wouldn't stay unfixed long. I wouldn't worry too much about there being APFS data loss bugs in Big Sur or Monterey. APFS came out in macOS 10.13 (High Sierra) in March 2017. It came out in Mac OS 8.1 in January 1998, and is a refinement of HFS, which came out in September 1985. HFS+ has had much longer to mature and to have any bugs shaken out of it. I can only hope that it does not do that same when using its partition systems. I am sad to say I do not trust Apple to make the best choices for me when it comes to handling photos because Apple defaults to shrinking and expanding files when transferring via icloud and it is work to avoid that. I know the general advantages and disadvantages of APFS and HFS+, but which one will store my photos and keep them stable the best? I am more concerned about stability and integrity than speed. It sounds like there might be advantages to HFS+, even on newer machines- especially when talking about formatting an external hard drive. It seems on the surface that APFS would be the obvious solution, but when I read in depth articles, I get confused by the discussion of partitions and such. My understanding is that using a Mac-only format would lessen the chances of corrupted files so I have narrowed the choices to APFS and HFS+. I have had issues with permissions being messed up and data corrupted in some older files. I always formatted my external drives in FAT32 or exFAT so that I could use them on Windows if I wanted, but that is very rarely a concern. I just bought a new 5 Tb LaCie rugged external hard drive and I plan for it to be come my first go to for working and long term important file storage (while relying on separate externals, one with time machine, just in case).
0 kommentar(er)
